Though they may also serve partisan purposes, they can move in unintended directions and are hard to control. I read both essays and the one that really stuck out to me would be essay number one. The reason I connected with this essay more than the other one because it involved real life situations that affect us. I liked how the author went back in time and used examples that colonists did as illegal things but ” for the good’ I think the second paper went on the ramble more than the first did.
Question is primarily one of intent and purpose. Accordingly, ‘good faith’ and ‘no legitimate purpose’ exceptions would apply when applicable. At the turn of the 20th century, there was a revival of rhetorical study manifested in the establishment of departments of rhetoric and speech at academic institutions, as well as the formation of national and international professional organizations.
A recent experimental survey argued that framing the issue as a matter of personal and collective health risk had a positive effect (Motta et al., 2021). The herd community argument has been shown to reduce vaccine hesitancy in other populations too (Schwarzinger et al., 2021). Determining the degree to which a nation’s healthcare is “universal” is complex and is not a “black and white” issue. For example, government backing, public will, and basic financing structure, among many other factors must be extensively considered.
As far as the fires are concerned, you need forest management. In addition to everything else, the forest floors are loaded up with trees, dead trees that are years midland mi dispensary old and they’re like tinder and leaves and everything else. You drop a cigarette in there the whole forest burns down. You’ve got to have forest management.
The enduring push for a less secular state has shaped Malaysian politics for decades, sharpening differences over political Islam. At the same time, divisions between Islamists and secularists have reinforced Malaysia’s ethnic polarization. Almost all Malays are Muslim, whereas ethnic minorities predominantly are not, and Islamist groups thus have melded their religious appeals with Malay nationalist messages. Race and religion have increasingly fused, with most Malays adopting an Islamist outlook and minority communities being more secular. Acts directed against individuals which do not disturb the society to the extent of causing a general disturbance of public tranquillity do not subvert public order, but are law and order issues. Referring to Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia’s case, it was observed that similar acts in different context may affect law and order in one case and public order in the other.
Another strain of research focusses on the specific role of “general purpose technologies” . In a comprehensive analysis, Lipsey et al. classify 24 different technologies, including the steam engine, railway, electricity, automobile, airplane, and computer, but also “organizational technologies” such as mass production or lean management, and others (p. 132). According to Lipsey et al. , GPT can be assigned characteristics such as genericness, scope for improvement, multiple applicability, and complementarity to existing technologies.
Indicating that the Court did take into account the ‘who’ factor as the appellants were unknown and inconsequential. This is of consequence as far as Section 153A of the Penal Code is concerned. Both the content and context, given the occasion, were highly incriminating and possibly warranted conviction, but as per paragraphs 10 and 11, the court was not convinced that the prosecution witnesses had spoken the whole truth and what slogan was/were actually shouted. Lastly, the harm effect or impact was also taken into account. What is acceptable speech in one case, it could be well argued, should be acceptable in another, and therefore the ratio in Balwant Singh must be applied with caution as the decision had proceeded on failure of the prosecution. The ‘who’ factor as a variable had weighed with the court.